Showing posts with label telegraph. Show all posts
Showing posts with label telegraph. Show all posts

Sunday, January 01, 2012

Invention of the Day: a Pack of Warhorses.

Over the last week during my regular dog walks, I've been listening to an audio course about China - From Yao to Mao: 5000 Years of Chinese History. (Visit your local library often this year!)
Lecture 20 covers a world upheaval in the 13th and 14th century: Mongol conquests. An important invention that powered the conquests (see map) was a novel use of horses.
Genghis Khan understood the importance of horses and insisted that his troops be solicitous of their steeds. A cavalryman normally had three or four, so that each was, at one time or another, given a respite from bearing the weight of the rider during a lengthy journey. Mongol horses could traverse the most rugged terrain and survive on little fodder.
According to Marco Polo, the horse also provided sustenance to its rider on long trips during which all the food had been consumed. On such occasions, the rider would cut the horse’s veins and drink the blood that spurted forth. Marco Polo reported, perhaps with some exaggeration, that a horseman could, by nourishing himself on his horse’s blood, “ride quite ten days’ marches without eating any cooked food and without lighting a fire.” And because its milk offered additional sustenance during extended military campaigns, a cavalryman usually preferred a mare as a mount.

The horses provided the Mongols with a huge communications advantage. Because horse-mounted troops were so fast it was practically impossible for cities to prepare for an attack. Intelligence, i.e. information about Mongol military movements, could not be delivered faster than the arrival of the Mongol troops to the battlefield. Since standing armies at the time were small, the cities did not have time to gather their forces from neighboring towns and villages. Essentially, the Mongol's "nervous system" worked faster than anything developed by their competitors.

It's the same pattern that worked for telegraph improve the railroad system; radio for tanks and motorized military units; DHL's breakthrough in document delivery; creation and distribution of playlists ahead of music collections; tweets and facebook messages ahead of demonstrations, and etc.


tags: system, payload, communications, control, telegraph, invention

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Invention of the Day: Industrial-scale warfare.

What made the American Civil War so unprecedented was that it was the first great war of the industrial era. This allowed not only greatly increased production of the materiel of war but a revolution in command and control as well. Railroads and steamboats made possible the rapid movement of large number of troops, and the telegraph enabled the entire war to be directed from Washington to Richmond in real time. When President Lincoln, on April 15, 1861, called for 75,000 volunteers after Confederate forces attacked Fort Sumter in Charleston harbor, the call reached the most distant parts of the Union states almost immediately.

A Thread Across the Ocean, by John Steele Gordon. p.163. (c)2002.

Communications are even more important today, when weapons are required to be a lot smarter than the cannons of the Civil War. Remote control drones in Afghanistan and Pakistan, operated by soldiers on the ground thousands miles away from the field of action, guided by NSA intelligence collected through eavesdropping on internet and phone messages throughout the world, can deliver precision ground strikes only if they have the right information at the right time. Otherwise, they turn into expensive dumb pieces of hardware, indistinguishable in their impact from their 150-year old Civil War cousins.

tags: scale, communications, warcraft, drones, infrastructure, detection, system, telegraph, information, control

p.s. this post, besides being a note on technology evolution, is also an exercise in writing cumulative sentences.

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Predicting future is not that hard.

In 2001, guided by the invention principle I call "Telegrams before the train", my son and I came up with an idea of a portable playlist (US patent application 20040057348). This year, a new music service Songvote pushed the concept a little bit further:

...about 70 percent of music enthusiasts don't want to spend hours creating the perfect playlists, meaning that unless you're a DJ--or just really hard-core about music arrangement--you'd probably prefer to just listen to your library on shuffle or have someone else do the mixing for you.

Songvote is the service for you. This extremely nifty (and completely free) Web-based app lets users create collaborative playlists based on a simple time-restrained voting system. Using it is ridiculously straightforward: visit the site; create a theme-, event-, or activity-based contest; and then sit back and wait for the votes to roll in.

This "Telegram" principle is hard at work within any large-scale system that aims to optimize its performance. According to it, in order for the system to become more efficient, it has to shift upstream (to the Source and Distribution) the task of solving detection problems, e.g. determining the "quality" of a particular song. That's how it was done with the telegrams and train schedules 150 years ago; and this is how it is being done today with playlists and songs.

tags: detection, control, telegraph, example, course, payload

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Lack of communication paralyzes strategy rather than tactics. This year, Tour de France organizers decided to ban radios from Stage 10 of the three-week race across four European countries. Team managers were unable to provide their riders with up-to-date information about competitors'. As a result, General Classification(GC) leaders (riders competing for the overall win of the Tour) could not make strategic decisions. Alberto Contador, who is currently the second in GC with 6 seconds behind the first place, said that "there was a degree of chaos", and "to ride without radios means that a fall in an evil moment may rob you of victory".

On the other hand, sprinters and riders low in GC didn't mind the ban because it gave them a chance to surprise leaders at the finish line.

Who won?
Mark Cavendish, the world's best sprinter today.