Tuesday, July 31, 2012

(BN) Samsung Lawyer Can’t Undo Apple Trial Evidence Ruling

July 31 (Bloomberg) -- Samsung Electronics Co. was again blocked from using evidence a lawyer for the company described as "critical" to rebutting Apple Inc.'s central allegations in a patent-infringement trial in California.

Samsung was barred by U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose from presenting images of a smartphone that it claims to have been developing in 2006, the year before Apple introduced the iPhone. Samsung said in a filing that the images show evidence that it was developing the next generation of mobile phones with a "simple, rounded rectangular body" before Apple's January 2007 announcement of the iPhone.

Before jurors heard opening arguments in the trial today, John B. Quinn, a Samsung lawyer, asked Koh to reconsider her decision yesterday barring the evidence.

Quinn, who said he had never begged in court in more than 30 years of practicing law, told Koh that he was "begging now."

Koh rejected the request for what she said was at least the third time.

"We've done three reconsiderations on this and we have a jury waiting," Koh told Quinn. "You've made your record."

"Don't make me sanction you, please," Koh said when Quinn persisted with his argument. "I want you to sit down please."

Samsung Statement

Koh's ruling means "Samsung was not allowed to tell the jury the full story and show the pre-iPhone design for that and other phones that were in development at Samsung in 2006, before the iPhone," Samsung said in an e-mailed statement after Koh's decision.

"The excluded evidence would have established beyond doubt that Samsung did not copy the iPhone design," the Suwon, South Korea-based company said in the statement.

Samsung's statement included attachments of the evidence that Koh had excluded, prompting a demand from Koh for an explanation of who drafted and issued the release. Koh told lawyers representing Samsung that she wanted a statement from Quinn explaining his role in issuing the statement.

Harold McElhinny, a lawyer for Apple, told Koh the release was "on perception an intentional attempt to pollute this jury" rising to "contempt of court."

Earlier today, Koh ruled Samsung can use some evidence from a former Apple designer to rebut the infringement allegations.

The designer, Shin Nishibori, helped create a model phone influenced by Sony Corp., and his testimony will explain how the model "changed the course of the iPhone's development," according to a Samsung court filing. Koh said the company could use it to demonstrate "functionality."

$2.5 Billion Claims

Apple, based in Cupertino, California, seeks $2.5 billion for its claims that Samsung infringed patents covering designs and technology for mobile devices.

Samsung countersued and will present claims that Apple is infringing two patents covering mobile-technology standards and three utility patents. Samsung is demanding royalties of as much as 2.4 percent for each device sold, according to a court filing.

Nishibori's evidence would support Samsung's "independent creation story" by proving the "design elements found in Samsung's phones were not taken from Apple, but were known to other designers in the field," according to the filing. The company sought to use e-mails and computer design images.

The case is Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 11- cv-01846, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).


1 comment:

Michel john said...

For anyone who is with issues while using the law, then you definately need to have another person exactly who appreciates this law. On the whole, prison law corporations guide these priced having violations or maybe misdemeanors. Even so, you will discover specialized attorneys truck Crash Law firm of which cope with unique appropriate complications. targeted visitors law firms, one example is, deliver tips in addition to counsel to help buyers handling motoring in addition to move complications. For anyone who is the subject of some sort of prison research, subsequently you might need a prison law firm who is going to manage this substantive difficulties on the violations you could have also been offender connected with enacting.